먼가 테스트 하다보니..
Firefox에서 이런 메타 태그가 보여서 성능 향상에 영향을 미칠까 하고 검색을 해보았지만..
CACHE-CONTROL
<META HTTP-EQUIV="CACHE-CONTROL" CONTENT="NO-CACHE"> HTTP 1.1. Allowed values = PUBLIC | PRIVATE | NO-CACHE | NO-STORE. Public - may be cached in public shared caches
Private - may only be cached in private cache
no-Cache - may not be cached
no-Store - may be cached but not archived
The directive CACHE-CONTROL:NO-CACHE indicates cached information should not be used and instead requests should be forwarded to the origin server. This directive has the same semantics as the PRAGMA:NO-CACHE. Clients SHOULD include both PRAGMA:NO-CACHE and CACHE-CONTROL:NO-CACHE when a no-cache request is sent to a server not known to be HTTP/1.1 compliant.
Also see EXPIRES.
Note: It may be better to specify cache commands in HTTP than in META statements, where they can influence more than the browser, but proxies and other intermediaries that may cache information.
[링크 : http://www.i18nguy.com/markup/metatags.html] |
정적 데이터에는 유효하나(캐싱된거 다시 쓰니)
동적 데이터(php 라던가?)는 이래저래 의미가 없을 듯 하다.
[링크 : http://blog.saltfactory.net/202]
'Programming > web 관련' 카테고리의 다른 글
웹소켓(websocket) (0) | 2015.01.07 |
---|---|
html / input type radio에서의 reset 처리 (0) | 2015.01.06 |
aptana / eclipse (0) | 2014.08.25 |
node.js (0) | 2014.07.07 |
부트스트랩 - 웹개발 프레임워크 (0) | 2014.07.07 |